Georgia · Glynn County · Missing & Alerts

Glynn County, GA: Sheriff's Office Defends Release of Inmate With Dementia Who Went Missing

An anonymous Facebook post questioned why a veteran with dementia walked out of the Glynn County Detention Center alone. The sheriff's office answered with a long account of what its employees did. One newsroom has reported it. Both sides are below, unreconciled.

What the Glynn County Sheriff's Office said happened

The Glynn County Sheriff's Office is defending how it handled the release of a veteran with dementia from the Glynn County Detention Center. WJCL reported that the agency issued a media release on Wednesday after a social media post raised questions about why the man left the detention center without a family member or caregiver.

In that release, according to WJCL, the agency said employees tried repeatedly to contact the man's family, reached out to community groups and veterans organizations, and ultimately arranged a motel room and meals at a deputy's expense.

WJCL reported that the man, identified as 67-year-old Eugene Thompson, was reunited with his wife Wednesday after leaving the motel on foot, according to the sheriff's office.

That is the shape of it: a criticism, and a detailed answer to the criticism. This page carries both. It does not decide between them, because deciding between them would require records and interviews that are not in the record compiled for this page.

One newsroom has reported this

This is a single-source story, and saying so out loud is the point of this section.

The record compiled for this page contains one news report: WJCL, the ABC affiliate in Savannah, owned by Hearst Television. The story carries the byline of Graham Cawthon, listed as digital media manager, and a timestamp of 12:48 p.m. ET on Aug. 12, 2026.

A single-source story is a legitimate story. What is not legitimate is dressing one report up as several. There is no second outlet on this page, no unnamed "reports say," and no phrase anywhere below that implies two newsrooms confirmed something one newsroom published. Where a sentence rests on WJCL, it says WJCL.

The practical consequence for a reader is worth stating plainly. Nearly every factual claim on this page traces to one newsroom's rendering of one agency's written statement. That is two layers of filter between you and the underlying events, and both layers are visible in the attribution on purpose.

What this page publishes about the man, and what it does not

A person with dementia cannot meaningfully consent to being written about. That is not a technicality. It changes what a news page is entitled to do.

WJCL published his name and his age, and this page uses them, because withholding an identification a named outlet has already made would leave a reader unable to tell whether the two accounts on this page describe the same person. Beyond that, this page holds back deliberately.

• No address. The sheriff's office said it did not have a home address for him, per WJCL, and this page publishes none.
• No motel. The record compiled for this page does not identify the motel, and this page will not name or locate one.
• No medical detail beyond the word the sheriff's office and the Facebook post both used: dementia. No diagnosis, no stage, no history.
• No family names. His wife and his son are not named in the record compiled for this page, and this page does not name them.
• Not in the headline or the web address. His name is in the body and FAQ of this story where it is needed for accuracy, and nowhere else.

That last choice is deliberate and worth explaining. A headline and a URL are what search engines carry forward for years. A man who could not agree to any of this should not have to carry a search result about the worst week of his life for the rest of his life.

The Facebook post that prompted the statement

WJCL reported that the agency issued its response after an anonymous member of a Facebook group posted about the release of a "70-year-old male veteran with dementia."

That phrase — "70-year-old male veteran with dementia" — is the only wording from the post that appears in the record compiled for this page. The person who wrote it is anonymous. The group is not identified.

Attention: an anonymous post is not evidence, and it is not nothing either. It is the thing the agency chose to answer, in writing, at length. This page treats it as exactly that: the criticism that produced the statement, quoted only as far as WJCL quoted it, with no guess about who wrote it or why.

Note also the arithmetic problem the post creates and does not solve. The post says 70. The sheriff's office says 67. Both figures appear on this page. Neither is corrected against the other.

The arrest: Aug. 2, and a different agency

WJCL reported that Glynn County police arrested Thompson on Aug. 2 on a failure-to-appear warrant.

Read that sentence for the agency name, because it is the detail most likely to be flattened by everyone who repeats this story. The Glynn County Police Department made the arrest. The Glynn County Sheriff's Office runs the jail. Those are two separate agencies with separate chains of command, and Glynn County is one of the counties in Georgia that has both.

A failure-to-appear warrant is issued when someone does not show up for a scheduled court appearance. It is a warrant about attendance. The record compiled for this page does not state what the underlying case was, and this page does not guess.

The release: a judge's order, on a Tuesday

WJCL reported that a judge ordered his release from the Glynn County Detention Center on Tuesday, according to the sheriff's office.

The story gives a weekday, not a calendar date, and this page is not going to quietly convert one into the other. Here is the arithmetic, shown rather than hidden: WJCL's story carries a timestamp of Wednesday, Aug. 12, 2026, so the Tuesday immediately before it was Aug. 11, 2026. That is a calculation from a published timestamp. It is not a date WJCL printed, and it is labeled that way everywhere it appears on this page.

On the same arithmetic, an arrest on Aug. 2 and a release on that Tuesday would put the man in the detention center for about nine days. Again: derived, not quoted.

This diagram reproduces one agency's account of its own conduct, as a single newsroom reported it. It is not a finding by a court, a prosecutor or an oversight body, and no step in it has been independently established in the record compiled for this page.

The lobby, and the calls that followed

WJCL reported that after his release, Thompson walked around the building before entering the sheriff's office lobby, and that he appeared confused and did not know where to go, according to the agency.

WJCL reported that Col. Morales, the sheriff's office chief of staff, spoke with Thompson and began trying to contact his family. The record compiled for this page gives no first name for Col. Morales.

Then, per WJCL, Morales contacted community organizations, the Department of Veterans Affairs and several area churches. Some were closed, and others were unable to assist, the agency said.

Notice what that list is. It is not a list of statutory obligations. It is an agency's own account of the calls it made, offered as evidence of effort. It reads as thorough. It is also unverified in the record compiled for this page, and it comes from the party being criticized.

What the agency says about the family

Two claims here concern private people who have not spoken publicly, and both are handled carefully.

WJCL reported that Morales reached Thompson's son in Jacksonville, Florida, but the son declined to help his father, the agency said.

WJCL reported that employees also repeatedly called a number provided for Thompson's wife, that the calls went unanswered, and that her voicemail could not accept messages. The sheriff's office said it did not have a home address for him.

Both of those are the sheriff's office's characterizations, relayed by WJCL. Neither the son nor the wife is quoted in the record compiled for this page. Neither is named there. This page is not going to describe what either of them was thinking, what they were able to do that day, or why a phone went unanswered. Families of people with dementia are frequently exhausted, frequently far away, and frequently not the villain of the story someone else is telling.

What can be said flatly is this: a full mailbox is not a statement, and an unanswered phone is not a decision.

The motel room a deputy paid for

WJCL reported that with no family member or organization available to help, a sheriff's deputy paid for Thompson's motel room and meals, and that Thompson was asked to remain at the motel while officials continued trying to determine where he lived and how to get him home safely.

WJCL reported that the agency said this was not the first time sheriff's office or detention center employees had personally provided someone with lodging and meals, and quoted the statement: "While these acts of kindness usually go unnoticed, the compassion they show is truly remarkable."

Two things are true at once here, and this page declines to collapse them into one. A deputy spending personal money on a stranger is a real act. And the agency's own account describes an arrangement that rested on a deputy's personal spending rather than on any program the agency names. Both observations follow from the agency's own account. Neither is a finding against anyone.

Advertisement

Ask VIC

Georgia victim assistance line

Get your questions answered.Free, any hour.

Ask what happens next, who pays for what, and what nobody is required to sign.

Answers for victims and their families.A real person, around the clock.Nothing to fill out. Nothing to sign.

(855) 5-ASKVIC (527-5842)

Free24/7Any question

Leaving on foot, and Wednesday's reunion

WJCL reported that Thompson later left the motel on foot, and that he was reunited with his wife Wednesday after a coordinated effort to locate him, according to the sheriff's office.

The record compiled for this page does not describe who conducted that coordinated effort, how long he was unaccounted for, how he was located, or what condition he was in when he was found. Those blanks stay blank here.

One point of language is worth flagging, because it is where a careless summary would go wrong. A man with dementia who walks away from a place he was asked to stay is not a person who escaped anything. He was not in custody at the motel. He had been released by court order the day before. Any word implying flight would be this page's invention, and it is not going to be made.

"Inmates are held and released by court order"

This is the center of the sheriff's office's defense, and it deserves to be quoted rather than paraphrased.

WJCL reported that the agency stressed that judges — not detention center employees — determine when inmates are released or transferred, and quoted the sheriff's office directly: "Inmates are held and released by court order."

WJCL also reported that the agency said people are often released without anyone waiting to pick them up, and that in other cases they remain in jail because no one is willing or able to pay their bond.

Set beside the criticism, the two positions do not actually meet. The Facebook post, as WJCL described it, questioned why the man left without a family member or caregiver. The agency's answer is about who has the authority to order a release. Those are different questions, and this page is not going to pretend the answer resolves the question.

A jail described as a mental health facility "by default"

WJCL reported that in defending its response, the sheriff's office said detention center employees regularly encounter people with dementia and other mental health conditions who have little or no family support.

WJCL reported that the agency described the Glynn County Detention Center as a mental health facility "by default," saying a shortage of community resources has left jails to serve as a catch-all for people in need.

Precision about the quotation marks matters here, so it is stated explicitly: the words inside quotation marks in WJCL's story are "by default." The surrounding description is WJCL's summary of the agency's statement, not a continuous verbatim quotation, and this page does not stretch the quotation marks past where WJCL put them.

It is a striking thing for a sheriff's office to say about its own jail, and it is the sentence most likely to be lifted and repeated without the two layers of attribution it actually carries.

What the sheriff's office asked residents to do

WJCL reported that officials encouraged residents concerned about the issue to contact state lawmakers about funding and to support local organizations that provide mental health and social services.

That is the agency's own recommended remedy, reproduced without endorsement. This page takes no position on whether more funding is the answer, whose funding it should be, or which organizations a reader should support.

Where the two accounts differ

This site's habit is to lay competing accounts side by side and leave them there. Usually that means two newsrooms. Here it means the anonymous post and the agency answering it, both as described by the one outlet in the record compiled for this page.

Neither column is checked against the other on this page. One is an anonymous claim. The other is a self-description by the agency whose conduct is being questioned. Those are different kinds of unverified, and a reader is entitled to weigh them personally rather than have it done for them.

Six agencies people merge in a story like this

Every sentence on this page names the specific agency it belongs to. Here is why that is not pedantry.

One agency does appear that is neither county nor state: WJCL reported that the sheriff's office chief of staff contacted the Department of Veterans Affairs, a federal department, along with community organizations and area churches.

Who actually decides when someone leaves a Georgia jail

The agency's defense rests on a division of authority, so it is worth setting out how that division works in Georgia generally, separate from this case.

A county jail in Georgia holds people under the process that put them there — a warrant, a commitment order, a sentence — and lets them go under the order that ends it. A sheriff runs the building. A judge sets bail, revokes it, orders release and orders transfer.

That is why O.C.G.A. § 42-4-7 requires the sheriff's jail record to name not just the day of discharge but the order under which the person was discharged and the court that issued it. The statute assumes the answer to "who let this person out" is a document from a court, and it requires the sheriff to write down which one.

None of that tells you whether any particular release was handled well. Authority and judgment are different things, and the statute only speaks to the first.

Is anyone reviewing this? What the record shows

No source in the record compiled for this page describes a review, an inquiry or an investigation into this release. Not by the sheriff's office, not by a court, not by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, not by Adult Protective Services, not by any state agency, not by anyone.

That sentence is scoped carefully and means exactly what it says. It is not a claim that no review exists. It is a statement about what this page was able to compile.

Equally, and just as importantly: this page does not state that any law, rule, policy or standard was violated, because no source in the record compiled for this page says one was. An anonymous post asking a pointed question is a question. It is not a finding.

What a Georgia jail record must contain

If you want to know what actually happened to a person in a Georgia county jail, the jail register is the document, and Georgia law is specific about what has to be in it.

O.C.G.A. § 42-4-7 requires the sheriff to keep a record of all persons committed to the jail of the county. That record must contain:

• the name of the person committed;
• that person's age, sex and race;
• under what process the person was committed, and from what court the process issued;
• the crime charged;
• the date of commitment to jail;
• the day of discharge;
• under what order the person was discharged, and the court from which that order issued.

The same statute provides that the record is subject to examination by any person in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 18 of Title 50 — the Georgia Open Records Act. In a dispute about who ordered a release and on what day, that register is the record that settles it, and it is a public one.

How to request records from the Glynn County Sheriff's Office

The Glynn County Sheriff's Office routes open records requests through an online portal at glynncountysheriff-ga.nextrequest.com, linked from the sheriff's office page on the Glynn County government website. The county lists the office as follows:

• Address — 100 Sulphur Springs, Brunswick, GA 31520
• Phone — 912-554-7600
• Email — [email protected]
• Hours — Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

Requests get answered faster when they are narrow. Name the specific record, give a date range, and say what format you want it in. "All records about" a person or an incident invites a fee estimate and a long wait; the jail register entry for a named date does not.

Attention: a request for records held by a court — a release order, for instance — usually goes to the clerk of that court rather than to the sheriff, even though the sheriff's register names the order.

What the Open Records Act entitles you to, and on what timeline

The Georgia Open Records Act is Article 4 of Chapter 18 of Title 50, O.C.G.A. § 50-18-70 through § 50-18-77, with §§ 50-18-70 to 50-18-74 doing the operative work. Two sections do most of the work for an ordinary reader.

O.C.G.A. § 50-18-71 is the access-and-cost section:

• Timeline. An agency must produce records responsive to a request within a reasonable amount of time not to exceed three business days of receiving it. If the records cannot be produced in that window, the agency must say so within it, and describe what is available and when.
• Copying. Under § 50-18-71(c)(2), an agency may charge no more than 10 cents per page for letter or legal size documents, or the actual cost of producing the copy for other formats.
• Staff time. Under § 50-18-71(c)(1), search, retrieval and redaction time may be billed at no more than the prorated hourly salary of the lowest paid full-time employee who has the skills needed to do the work — and no charge may be made for the first quarter hour.
• Your own camera. You may make photographic or electronic copies yourself using a suitable portable device brought to the place of inspection, which avoids the per-page charge entirely.

O.C.G.A. § 50-18-72 is the exemption section, and two subsections come up constantly:

• § 50-18-72(a)(4) covers records of a pending investigation or prosecution — while making clear that initial police arrest reports and initial incident reports remain public.
• § 50-18-72(a)(2) covers medical or veterinary records and similar files whose disclosure would be an invasion of personal privacy.

That second exemption is the one that will shape any records request touching this story. A person's medical condition is precisely the category the statute walks around, and a request that asks for it is a request likely to come back redacted.

Mattie's Call: Georgia's alert for a missing adult with dementia

Georgia has a dedicated public alert for exactly the situation this story is about. It is called Mattie's Call, and it is Georgia's alert for a missing disabled or elderly adult.

According to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, a Mattie's Call can be activated only by a local law enforcement agency, and only when all of the following are met:

• the agency believes a disabled person is missing and in immediate danger of serious bodily injury or death;
• the agency's own investigation verifies the disappearance and rules out alternative explanations;
• there is enough shareable information to help the public locate the person;
• the person has been entered into the National Crime Information Center database;
• the agency issues a statewide broadcast to law enforcement and 911 centers and contacts local media.

The GBI says Georgia law defines disabled adults as individuals who are developmentally impaired or who suffer from dementia or some other cognitive impairment.

The record compiled for this page does not say whether a Mattie's Call was requested, considered or issued in this case. This section is here because readers searching this story will want to know the mechanism exists, not because anything on this page establishes that it was or was not used.

Georgia's law on protecting at-risk adults

Georgia's framework for adults who cannot fully protect themselves is O.C.G.A. § 30-5-1 et seq., the chapter on protection of disabled adults and elder persons.

O.C.G.A. § 30-5-4 is the reporting section. A report is supposed to include the name and address of the disabled adult or elder person, and should include the name and address of the caretaker, the person's age, the nature and extent of any injury or condition resulting from abuse, exploitation or neglect, and other pertinent information. When such a report is made first to a law enforcement agency, that agency must forward it to the director or his or her designee within 24 hours of receipt.

O.C.G.A. § 30-5-5 covers the investigation that follows a report. The continuing obligation to immediately report the discovery of any evidence that may constitute a crime sits in § 30-5-4 itself, which also requires a suspected crime to be forwarded to the appropriate law enforcement agency or prosecuting attorney.

Those statutes are set out here as general Georgia law. Nothing in the record compiled for this page indicates that a report under this chapter was made, received or investigated in connection with this release, and this page does not suggest that one should have been.

If someone you love has dementia and is in a Georgia jail

This is the practical section, and it is written for the reader who found this page because they are afraid of the same phone call.

• Put it in writing, and keep a copy. Tell the jail in writing that the person has a diagnosed cognitive condition and that you want to be contacted before any release. A verbal mention at a window does not survive a shift change.
• Give more than one number. Give the jail at least two working phone numbers and a mailing address, and check that the voicemail on each number can actually accept a message. A full mailbox is how a family becomes unreachable on paper.
• Talk to the court, not only the jail. In Georgia a judge orders a release. If timing matters to you, the case file and the clerk of court are where that decision lives.
• Ask about the release plan by name. Ask who will be told, when, and what happens if nobody arrives. Get the answer in writing if you can.
• Know the alert exists. If an adult with dementia goes missing, ask the responding local law enforcement agency about a Mattie's Call. Only that agency can activate one.
• Know the reporting law. If you believe an at-risk adult is being abused, neglected or exploited, the reporting statute is O.C.G.A. § 30-5-4.
• Request the jail register. Under O.C.G.A. § 42-4-7 it must show the day of discharge and the order and court behind it, and it is open to examination under the Open Records Act.

The Local Alert is not a law firm and not a government agency, and none of the above is legal advice.

What we don't know yet

Not one line above is filled in by inference. This page does not revisit itself, and it makes no promise to.

Frequently asked questions

What happened in Glynn County, Georgia?
The Glynn County Sheriff's Office issued a media release on Wednesday defending how it handled the release of a veteran with dementia from the Glynn County Detention Center, after an anonymous member of a Facebook group posted about the release of a 70-year-old male veteran with dementia. WJCL reported that the sheriff's office said its employees tried repeatedly to contact the man's family, reached out to community groups and veterans organizations, and ultimately arranged a motel room and meals at a deputy's expense. The sheriff's office said the man, identified as 67-year-old Eugene Thompson, was reunited with his wife Wednesday after leaving the motel on foot. WJCL is the only outlet carrying this story in the record compiled for this page.

Did the Glynn County Sheriff's Office break any law or policy?
The record compiled for this page contains no statement by any agency, official or outlet that a law or a policy was broken. It contains a criticism posted anonymously in a Facebook group and a detailed response from the sheriff's office. The Local Alert is not in a position to judge between them and is not going to try. Nothing on this page should be read as a finding that anyone did anything wrong.

Is anyone investigating or reviewing the release?
The record compiled for this page does not include any statement that a review, an inquiry or an investigation is underway, by the sheriff's office, by a court, by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, by Adult Protective Services or by anyone else. That is not the same as saying no review exists. It means no source in the record compiled for this page describes one.

Who released the man from jail?
WJCL reported that a judge ordered his release from the Glynn County Detention Center on Tuesday, according to the sheriff's office, and that the sheriff's office said inmates are held and released by court order. The Glynn County Sheriff's Office operates the detention center and carried out the release. The agency's position is that judges, not detention center employees, determine when inmates are released or transferred.

Which agency arrested him?
WJCL reported that Glynn County police arrested him on Aug. 2 on a failure-to-appear warrant. The Glynn County Police Department and the Glynn County Sheriff's Office are two separate agencies. The police department made the arrest; the sheriff's office operates the detention center, carried out the court-ordered release and issued the public statement.

Why does his age appear as both 67 and 70?
Because two different accounts give two different ages. WJCL reported that an anonymous member of a Facebook group posted about the release of a 70-year-old male veteran with dementia, and that the sheriff's office identified the man as 67-year-old Eugene Thompson. The Local Alert publishes both figures and does not pick one. Reconciling them would be our conclusion rather than a reported fact.

Was he found?
WJCL reported that the sheriff's office said he was reunited with his wife Wednesday after a coordinated effort to locate him, following his departure from the motel on foot. That is the sheriff's office's account as reported by WJCL. The record compiled for this page does not describe his condition when he was located.

Who paid for the motel room?
WJCL reported that a sheriff's deputy paid for the man's motel room and meals, after the sheriff's office said no family member or organization was available to help. The sheriff's office also said this was not the first time sheriff's office or detention center employees had personally provided someone with lodging and meals, and its statement read: While these acts of kindness usually go unnoticed, the compassion they show is truly remarkable.

What did the sheriff's office say about the man's family?
WJCL reported that Col. Morales, the sheriff's office chief of staff, reached the man's son in Jacksonville, Florida, but that the son declined to help his father, according to the agency. WJCL also reported that employees repeatedly called a number provided for the man's wife, that the calls went unanswered and that her voicemail could not accept messages, and that the sheriff's office said it did not have a home address for him. Those are the agency's characterizations of what happened. No family member is quoted in the record compiled for this page, and The Local Alert is not going to describe anyone's reasons.

What did the sheriff's office say about mental health and the jail?
WJCL reported that the sheriff's office described the Glynn County Detention Center as a mental health facility by default, saying a shortage of community resources has left jails to serve as a catch-all for people in need, and that detention center employees regularly encounter people with dementia and other mental health conditions who have little or no family support. The words by default appear in quotation marks in WJCL's story. The surrounding description is WJCL's summary of the agency's statement rather than a continuous quotation.

How many news outlets have reported this story?
One outlet appears in the record compiled for this page: WJCL, the ABC affiliate in Savannah, owned by Hearst Television. A single-source story is still a publishable story, and this page says so plainly rather than implying a level of corroboration that does not exist. Every factual sentence here traces to that one report or to a Georgia statute or agency page cited by name.

What is a Mattie's Call?
Mattie's Call is Georgia's public alert for a missing disabled or elderly adult. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation says it can be activated only by a local law enforcement agency, and only when that agency believes a disabled person is missing and in immediate danger of serious bodily injury or death, has verified the disappearance through its own investigation, has enough shareable information to help locate the person, has entered the person into the National Crime Information Center database, and issues a statewide broadcast to law enforcement and 911 centers while contacting local media. The GBI says Georgia law defines disabled adults as individuals who are developmentally impaired or who suffer from dementia or some other cognitive impairment. The record compiled for this page does not say whether a Mattie's Call was requested or issued in this case.

How do I request records from the Glynn County Sheriff's Office?
The Glynn County Sheriff's Office directs open records requests to an online portal at glynncountysheriff-ga.nextrequest.com, reached through the sheriff's office page on the Glynn County government website. The county lists the sheriff's office at 100 Sulphur Springs, Brunswick, GA 31520, with a phone number of 912-554-7600 and an email address of [email protected], and office hours of Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. A request naming the specific record you want, with a date range, moves faster than a broad one.

What does the Georgia Open Records Act actually entitle me to?
Under O.C.G.A. § 50-18-71, an agency must produce records responsive to a request within a reasonable amount of time not to exceed three business days of receiving it, or tell you in that window when the records will be available and what they will cost. Copying is capped at 10 cents per page for letter or legal size documents under O.C.G.A. § 50-18-71(c)(2), or the actual cost of producing a copy for other formats. Search, retrieval and redaction time is billed at no more than the prorated hourly salary of the lowest paid full-time employee with the necessary skills under O.C.G.A. § 50-18-71(c)(1), and no charge may be made for the first quarter hour. Exemptions are listed in O.C.G.A. § 50-18-72, including records of a pending investigation or prosecution under subsection (a)(4), and medical records and similar files whose disclosure would be an invasion of personal privacy under subsection (a)(2).

What record does a Georgia sheriff have to keep about a jail release?
O.C.G.A. § 42-4-7 requires the sheriff to keep a record of every person committed to the county jail. That record must contain the person's name, age, sex and race, the process under which the person was committed and the court that issued it, the crime charged, the date of commitment, the day of discharge, the order under which the person was discharged and the court that issued that order. The same statute makes the record subject to examination by any person under the Open Records Act. In a dispute about who ordered a release and when, that is the document that answers it.

What should I do if a relative with dementia is in a Georgia jail?
Put the jail on notice in writing that the person has a diagnosed cognitive condition and that you want to be contacted before any release, and keep a copy. Give the jail more than one working phone number and an address, and make sure the voicemail on each number can actually accept a message. Ask the court handling the case, not only the jail, because a Georgia judge is the one who orders a release. If you believe an at-risk adult is being neglected or exploited, Georgia's reporting law for disabled adults and elder persons is O.C.G.A. § 30-5-4, and a report made first to a law enforcement agency must be forwarded to the director or his or her designee within 24 hours.